As this government is nearing its end, the same as the original romance of the same, the more I wonder what conservative hypocrisy that was his character. I have nothing against the term conservative, as an ecologist I am an extreme conservative end, because nothing is more strictly conservative ecology, and is not the only issue that could define me well. If I pull the language in terms of crime-understanding the crime as what actually harms others against their will or ability to discern "some sensitive souls may become red and progressive wonder and do not come over to this blog. And are not the only aspect, of course. But the government of FA has been puritanical, hypocritical complacent and conservative, run by a man - Vázquez - which is strictly a millionaire businessman who has absolutely nothing left beyond being born in a working class neighborhood, and the mass electorate, which suffered four decades struggled to come to power or who is cultural continuity or subsidiary This, valued and appreciated, understood as the triumph (in the case of the best intentions, even if the other-as an opportunity and ability to do things and change the reality, which has stood stoically that essentially has not changed nothing, and that the changes that have made a number made in the direction exactly opposite to freedom.
debate these days is a new provision of the MSP again lashes out against the tobacco companies for having committed a terrible crime: using the most basic semiology, while the most abstract, the chromatic, so that customers understand them volunteers. I mean, in the thousand and one anti-smoking measures implemented by Vázquez, some sensible but used as an excuse to pass other arbitrary repression, was found to prohibit the use of the word light on any brand of cigarette , considering that consumers are deceived. The theory is: adult smokers (cigarette sales is properly prohibited to minors) are mentally retarded despite the extensive propaganda that reports on the damages of smoking, they will think that if light are safe and will smoke the triple. light word means, as everyone knows, "light" or "mild" (and "light", but that is a polysemy that is irrelevant and does not help a damn in this argument), and any smoker knows why cigarettes are so named, because they are softer, because her taste is less intense, less irritating because the ducts through which it passes the smoke and no doubt because they have a lower burden of nicotine. Try to give him light a cigarette tabacómano a real calm and effect or stimulant nicotine-perhaps the only substance that can, depending on the psychological needs is stimulating and soothing at the same time, it will be almost imperceptible and inatisfactorio, so that besides the difference in taste, it is clear that light cigarettes are less addictive.
"All fake! All fake!" bellowed as the government, which as we all know never cheated anyone in their propaganda and advertising presentations, and whose candidates, as we all know, are not doing illegal propaganda right now, "and the tobacco companies already have the ban more While unlikely to advertise any kind, had to eliminate the concept light of their boxes. It turns out that these insidious cancer merchants invented a trick that led the wrath of the good doctor, began to sell their old cigarettes differentiating light standard product by the color of the boxes. What bastards, what daring. Use colors.
(brief parenthesis of the deceitful and misleading ads that occupy three quarters of the boxes of cigarettes is a remarkable example of boomerang effect. This is a photo-treated suppose because we do not imagine leaving the state advertising smoking a child-a baby smoking something haggard under question "Is she like you?". No, not like me because I am a pussy that my health quit smoking ten years ago, immediately getting overweight is possibly more dangerous to my health than cigarettes. I would like to be like that baby because I remember how good I had a cigarette in his mouth, but I do not look, I'm not manly. That baby smokes at the corner of his lip like Humphrey Bogart in The Big Sleep. Everything sucks an egg, "you hit the dummy", seems to say, "I'm fine and up to the time of the breast. From my mother and yours, maraca ...". It is the most charismatic baby in recent years, is similar baby smoke-pure Roger Rabbit. I'm sure the baby nursery that takes the punches to any Vázquez grandson and her face full of fingers to any child of Chris Namus . I really commend the designers of this campaign, turned to brighten up the cigarette boxes. Humphrey Baby Go, go).
Thus, the MSP is now seeking to ban the differential use of colors on the boxes of cigarettes, forced to unify all single-brand products, so that in addition to all the extra costs that entails the tobacco companies and will surely move to smokers, former smokers or Nevada Coronado light will have to get a map to know how the hell they are called they want smoking cigarettes, because besides being banned cigarette advertising, the companies are not going to tell them. I have no desire to defend the tobacco companies for decades evil companies did their best to hide or play down the damage that smoking does to its users, but the inalienable right not to be insulted in their right to self-determine what they want to do health and safeguarding essential liberties. As the use of words and colors.
Maiztegui Lincoln, a staunch defender of the right to smoke and non-stigmatization smoker, compared the anti-MSP terminology of the prohibition of appointing pachequista tupamaros in the early 70's. An exercise in linguistic oppression which forced newspapers to call for the guerrillas as "subversive" or "terrorists", and some dribble with elegance calling them "unspeakable." One way to control communications in addition to repressive and ignorant of the context is terribly hysterical, since it implies that what is not named does not exist. This guarangada is definitely an example of suppression of information, justified paternalistic in our own good. "But what will they see and how you will name the look of Maiztegui! "I can say," do not say cigarettes and kill people! ". Well, the Tupamaros also killed people, and also often speak.
seems pointless to me stick around on this, which is clearly an exercise of hysteria based advertising, rather than on the health of the Uruguayans, the advertising operation of its defense and the fear of cancer unbeatable. Cancer is a terrible disease, with more than half of my immediate predecessors, and even my dog \u200b\u200bdead I have the same idea some, but not for all the world is something entirely negative. For one thing the president did cancer Vázquez, a man who has built his popularity and image of bonhomie in its status as an oncologist. For the time being not to have left the profession despite having to handle the details of governing a country allowed it to increase its assets, personnel, because there have been accounts of their family business of medicine, in a 180% these years in office. Cancer Garp.
But there are cancers and cancers, because the same MSP that behaves like a cigarette could kill a suspected smoke in an open environment like a truck at 180 kmph, which prevented the importation by a private hospital a team of early detection of cancer (PET) to the American Hospital that he considered unfair competition public health, which is waiting for you to finish the Uruguayan Center for Molecular Imaging (Cudim) to put Henry Engler, the scientific tupamaro at front. Nor would the cancers as cancers of cancer patients Rivera Hospital, where all operations are being postponed again and again because the MSP could not implement an adequate number of anesthetists to perform (for the simple reason that they are not, as this and all other governments always gave the corporate pressure of keeping the training of anesthesiologists, a particularly profitable specialty-in low numbers and avoid excessive competition.) And less quantifiable levels would be so fucking possible cancers caused by the ingestion of red meat in excess, that the state promotes all possible ways, or cancers caused by pollution of water courses Bogota (actually would be cancer at milder produced by any of the environmental decisions of this government that has definitely shown that the ecology is not a priority). Or those who produce almost no use of monitoring use of pesticides. Or those who could afford the use of atomic energy, wet dream of leaders who want quick solutions to the energy gap.
But anyway, forbid colors and words, which is easier, more noticeable and those affected are going to endure, and that while the habit of smoking is increasingly persecuted, authoritative decisions of smoking is on the rise . I do not see why should be surprised: when leaders like Obama Zapatero or somewhat -emblems of progressive change in their countries-conservatives took power, the first thing they did was create a series of measures for the right libertarian abortion, scientific research and gender equality, on the understanding that-regardless of their objectives and capabilities needed last- Not only that, as claimed by Nanni Moretti in Aprile - something "left", but also do so to the people who brought them to power felt a bit of fresh air in your lungs symbolic. The first action was symbolic Vázquez notorious monument to deploy a criminal Karol Wojtyla in a privileged place in Montevideo the secular. If the Uruguayans were smoked it, why do not smoke this semiotic war?
It goes without saying that smoking is bad for health, is both snuff, coca paste or, above all, pure hypocritical authoritarianism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment